Evaluation of Civil Liberties in Hybrid Regimes

Hong Kong leads civil liberties within hybrid regimes with a score of 7.94, followed by countries like Papua New Guinea and Paraguay with scores of 7.35. This analysis delves into the performance of civil liberties across hybrid regimes, highlighting the top performers and the regions that are struggling to provide basic freedoms to their citizens.

Top Countries in Civil Liberties in Hybrid Regimes

Hong Kong ranks highest with a score of 7.94, reflecting a higher degree of civil liberties compared to other hybrid regimes. Papua New Guinea and Paraguay follow closely with scores of 7.35, indicating a reasonable level of political freedoms and civil rights in these nations, although restrictions persist due to the hybrid nature of their regimes. Other countries in the top ranks include Romania (7.06) and Peru (6.47), which have varying degrees of civil liberties despite challenges in maintaining full democracy.

Bottom Countries in Civil Liberties in Hybrid Regimes

Turkey, Angola, and Ivory Coast stand out as the lowest performers, with scores of 2.06, 2.35, and 3.82 respectively. These countries face significant restrictions on political freedoms, media independence, and civil rights, making it difficult for their citizens to fully enjoy their civil liberties. They are marked by strong authoritarian influences, limiting the scope for political participation and expression.

Which Country Leads in Civil Liberties?

Hong Kong leads in civil liberties among hybrid regimes, with a score of 7.94. Despite being a hybrid regime, it maintains a higher degree of political freedoms and civil rights compared to many others. However, Hong Kong still faces significant challenges due to political restrictions, especially after recent political changes, making it a complicated case in evaluating civil liberties in hybrid regimes.

Why Do Some Countries Excel in Civil Liberties?

Countries like Hong Kong, Papua New Guinea, and Paraguay excel in civil liberties due to their relatively open political environments, despite the presence of hybrid characteristics. These countries have fostered a more robust civil society, offering greater political participation and fewer constraints on free speech compared to other hybrid regimes. However, the situation remains fluid, as many of these countries experience internal political pressures that can impact civil liberties.

What Are the Global Trends in Civil Liberties in Hybrid Regimes?

The global trend shows that countries with more open political spaces, such as Hong Kong and Paraguay, tend to offer greater civil liberties in hybrid regimes. These countries, despite their hybrid political systems, have managed to provide better protection of political freedoms. On the other hand, countries like Turkey and Angola face greater challenges in upholding civil liberties due to authoritarian tendencies that curtail freedoms and rights.

How Do High and Low Performers Compare in Civil Liberties?

The contrast between high performers like Hong Kong and low performers like Turkey highlights significant differences in the protection of civil liberties. High performers often have better systems of legal protection, a more active civil society, and fewer restrictions on free speech and media. In contrast, low performers struggle with authoritarian governance, limiting civil rights and stifling public discourse.