Assessment of Political Participation in Hybrid Regimes

Mexico and Ukraine top the political participation rankings in hybrid regimes with a score of 7.22, reflecting higher levels of citizen engagement despite limitations in democratic freedoms. This analysis highlights the top-performing countries, bottom performers, and factors influencing political participation in hybrid regimes.

Top Countries in Political Participation in Hybrid Regimes

Mexico and Ukraine lead the rankings with a score of 7.22, indicating relatively high levels of political participation in the context of hybrid regimes. These countries have active civil societies, though they still face challenges in terms of political pluralism and institutional integrity. Paraguay and Kenya follow closely with a score of 6.67, reflecting moderate political participation but facing varying degrees of democratic setbacks.

Bottom Countries in Political Participation in Hybrid Regimes

Countries such as Papua New Guinea, Bhutan, and Gambia have the lowest political participation scores, each scoring 3.89. These countries face significant challenges in mobilizing their populations for political processes, reflecting limitations in political freedom, civil society involvement, and often limited access to political power for large segments of the population.

Which Country Leads in Political Participation?

Mexico and Ukraine share the top spot with a score of 7.22, demonstrating active political participation in their hybrid regimes. Both countries benefit from a relatively active electorate and political space where citizens engage in the electoral process, though both still struggle with systemic issues such as corruption and the concentration of power.

Why Do Some Countries Excel in Political Participation?

Countries like Mexico and Ukraine excel in political participation due to a combination of political mobilization, active civil societies, and regular elections. While these nations are classified as hybrid regimes, they maintain a level of electoral competition and political engagement that fosters greater participation compared to other hybrid regimes with more restrictive environments.

What Are the Global Trends in Political Participation in Hybrid Regimes?

The global trend in hybrid regimes shows that while political participation is generally more restricted than in full democracies, countries like Mexico, Ukraine, and Paraguay maintain relatively higher levels of engagement. However, even in these nations, the quality of democracy is often compromised by political corruption, media restrictions, and limited political pluralism.

How Do High and Low Performers Compare in Political Participation?

High-performing countries like Mexico and Ukraine show that political participation can thrive even in hybrid regimes, driven by factors such as active political campaigns, increasing voter awareness, and some degree of political pluralism. In contrast, low-performing countries like Papua New Guinea and Bhutan struggle with engagement due to limited political freedoms, systemic challenges, and restricted civil liberties, which hinder the ability of citizens to effectively participate in the political process.